I said “slap me thrice and hand me over me momma” when, after watching this film, I recalled it is Austrian by birth. This is a stinkingly American film. It valorizes, eulogizes, extols, lauds, and sings “Ave Maria” to all possible clichés Americans, oh! so like about Nazi atrocities. How many films have you seen about concentration camps? From the early “Young Lions” to our veritable “Schindler’s List”, there is one and only predominant cliché about the Nazis: they were a mass of extreme psychopaths with an insatiable appetite for unexplainable cruelty. A complete society and race of Buffalo Bills and Tooth Fairies. And no one even remotely as interesting as Hannibal the “Cannibal”. Have you ever seen a movie from The film centers on a Jewish counterfeiter, Salomon Sorowitsch (played by Karl Markovics), who is used in an operation to create lots of fake dollars and pounds by his old apprehender, Friedrich Herzog (played by Devid Striesow, and the spelling is not a mistake) at a Nazi concentration camp. The rest of the film can be guessed by anyone other than zombies: the guy Solomon becomes a copy of the character played by Sir Alec Guinness in “The Bridge on the River Kwai”; he starts to compromise with everything and tries to survive. Bluh, bluh. There were potentially good sections in the film that remained under-developed: at the beginning and the end of the movie, we see Solomon, after the war, playing extravagantly at a casino. The character of Herzog had brilliant potential: he is an opportunist who happens to wear the Nazi swastika, and believes he will be “handling humans” after the war. I am amazed they never foresaw the potential of a film where a gambler and a crafty bureaucrat meet and we discover that the gambler was the prisoner of a concentration camp, where the bureaucrat used to be the jailer. Someone like Michael Mann would have done exactly that. But we are talking about lesser humans here. Frankly speaking, I am flabbergasted with these routine “Nazi” movies. And, like salt over wound, it uses one of the most disgusting cliches of contemporary cinema: jerky hand-held cameras, as if making a faux-documentary. It seems that the film fraternity has completely forgotten the characteristics of the genre called mock-documentary. it was the last thing, as a viewer I needed. Enough was enough.
I will instead give you a bigger picture. There is this lovely little 1969 comedy called “If it’s Tuesday, This must be
This film is disgusting not because it is made by the worst director and the worst script-writer ever, but because it makes mockery of the medium of thought called film. Film is as much a medium thought as literature is. Anyone who insults that, anyone who treats like a piece of Weekly Easy-to-make Recipe for Tomato soup, deserves to be vilified to the limit. I demand a minimum level of intelligence from a creator, especially when he is pretending to be discoursing about “serious” matters. This film does not have that quality. It will get a 1 from me.
If you want to see a good film, and if you are downloading torrents (legal, or illegal, its up to you. It has nothing to with me), then try downloading Gus Van Sant’s “
BAIDURYA CHAKRABARTI
No comments:
Post a Comment